The referral and requirement that an individual pursue standalone referrals prior to CPST significantly limits service options and indicates a lack of person centered approach to treatment.
Referral to Standalone EBPs:
Assertive Community treatment has narrow diagnostic criteria and exclusionary criteria for certain personality disorders
Clubhouse open to all with SMI with exclusionary criteria related to safety concerns
Coordinated Specialty Care- only for 1st episode psychosis
FFT for children/families
Multisystemic Family Therapy only for kids/families
Of the standalone EBPs only 1 can serve a wide range of diagnostic criteria for adults with SMI- not much in way of choice or person-centered options. 2 are for children. Very limited options/alternatives for care.
Referrals, if appropriate, have to occur prior to admission to CPST, and again if an individual is unsuccessful in CPST program. If individual didn't qualify for a standalone EBP to begin with, why would they meet criteria after not progressing in CPST?