Please protect family values and teachers by rejecting the current wording of the amendment.
We can preserve current safeguards without resorting to suspicion reminiscent of witch hunts. 

How is a topic or book “potentially” explicit or sensitive?  How do you define sensitive?  Will teachers be dismissed because a phrase is NOT sensitive or sexually explicit, but because someone claims that it could be “potentially” taken that way?  Will all puns, metaphors and minor innuendos become a criminal offense?

Bad cases make bad laws. Do not permit obscure, individual controversies - where people of good will differ – to become confusing and oppressing laws. This amendment is not necessary, and it will only create more confusion and conflicting regulations.  Table it for now.